Thursday, May 17, 2012

US Mint Numismatic Silver Coin Pricing

Before rebounding today, the market price of silver had experienced a sharp decline from more than $36 per ounce to under $28 per ounce. Given the decline, I thought it would be a good time to revisit how the US Mint changes prices for silver numismatic products and examine the current product prices.

Although the US Mint adopted a flexible pricing policy for gold and platinum numismatic products, they retained the old method of pricing for silver numismatic products.

Under the old method, prices must be adjusted through a more involved process which involves officially providing notice by publication within the Federal Register. This process has sometimes led to suspensions lasting up to a few weeks while new prices are being established, although sometimes prices have been adjusted more quickly. The US Mint has not publicly revealed their criteria for when pricing changes are made for silver numismatic products, however looking at current pricing levels and past actions provides some clues about where the US Mint’s current thresholds might be.

The one ounce 2011-W Uncirculated Silver Eagle is currently priced at $45.95. This price was last adjusted ($5 reduction) on December 27, 2011 when the market price of silver was around $29 per ounce. Sales were subsequently suspended on February 24, 2012, when silver was above $35 per ounce, but later resumed when the price of silver fell back.

The five ounce 2011-P America the Beautiful Silver Coins are currently priced at $204.95 each. The prices were last adjusted ($25 reduction) on December 27, 2011 when silver was around $29 per ounce. Sales were suspended on February 24, 2012 with silver above $35 per ounce, but resumed after silver declined.

The one ounce 2011-W Proof Silver Eagle went on sale April 12, 2012 priced at $59.95.  This price was established through publication in the Federal Register dated March 12, 2012 when the market price of silver was $31.47.

Although the US Mint is sometimes unpredictable, it seems like the prices for the numismatic Silver Eagles and 5 oz. ATB coins will not be adjusted unless silver falls more significantly below the level of the last adjustment or rises above $35 per ounce. It might be possible that the US Mint will slightly adjust prices of the Silver Eagles to keep them in line with the San Francisco Set scheduled for release on June 6, 2012. (They made slight adjustments to Silver Eagle products ahead of the release of the 25th Anniversary Set last year.)

The 2011 Silver Proof Set contains 1.33823 troy ounces of silver and is priced at $67.95. The 2012 Silver Proof Set is scheduled for release on June 4, 2012 and is also priced at $67.95. The price for the 2011 set had been established on January 4, 2011 when the market price of silver was $30.67 per once. Sales were suspended a few months later when silver rose to $43 per ounce, but resumed after the price fell back. In September 2011, the US Mint briefly suspended sales when silver fell to less than $30 per ounce, but later resumed sales with no price change.

The 2011 America the Beautiful Quarters Silver Proof Set contains 0.90420 troy ounces of silver and is priced at $41.95. The 2012 set is priced at the same level. The price for the 2011 set was established on March 18, 2011 when the market price of silver was $35.15 per ounce. Sales were suspended one month later when silver rose to $43 per ounce, but resumed after silver declined. In September 2011, sales were briefly suspended when silver fell below $30, but later resumed with no change.

The US Mint seems to have a very wide tolerance for the annual sets containing 90% silver coins. During the past few years, they have suspended sales and raised prices only when the melt value + other face value of the sets had risen to within a few dollars of the product price. However, when silver prices fell, they have never reduced the prices.

The 2012 commemorative silver dollars contain 0.7736 troy ounces of silver and are priced at $54.95 for proofs and $49.95 for uncirculated coins. The 2011 September 11 National Medal contains 1 troy ounce of silver and is priced at $66.95.

To my knowledge, the US Mint has never adjusted prices for commemorative silver dollars or silver medals during the course of an offering (excluding the changes related to pre-issue discounts). Based on this, I don’t think the US Mint would undertake any pricing action for these products unless the market price of silver rises to a point where the intrinsic value of the coins approaches the product prices.

Wednesday, May 16, 2012

Numismatic Gold Coin Prices Reduced

Effective earlier today, the United States Mint has reduced prices for gold numismatic products. This brings prices back to the same levels that were in effect at the very beginning of this year.

The weekly average market price of gold based on the London Fix prices from the prior Thursday AM to the current Wednesday AM was $1,569.64. This fell into the $1,550 to $1,599.99 range, which was one pricing tier lower than the previous week. Since the Wednesday PM Fix price agreed directionally, pricing adjustments were made. The prices for impacted products were decreased by one tier, or the equivalent of $50 for each ounce of gold content. (For more information on how numismatic gold products are priced, refer to this post.)

Products with reduced prices include the 2011 First Spouse Gold Coins, 2011 & 2012 Proof Gold Buffalo, 2011 & 2012 Proof American Gold Eagles, and 2012 commemorative gold coins.

At the time of this post, the market price of gold is $1,539.90, which is already below the range used to calculate the reduced prices.

The continuing decline in precious metals prices has had the impact of reducing sales for the US Mint’s gold and silver numismatic products. Last week, declines took place for nearly all silver products. In this week’s report published yesterday, declines were noted for 15 out of 18 gold products.

Friday, May 11, 2012

How the US Mint Determines Price Changes for Gold and Platinum Numismatic Products

In early 2009, the United States Mint adopted a pricing policy for certain gold and platinum numismatic products which allows product prices to be updated as often as weekly in response to changes in precious metals prices. The method for determining price changes is not exactly straight forward and there are frequently questions about it, so I wanted to devote a post to explaining the policy in detail.

Prior to adopting the new policy, the Mint was required to publish notice of any pricing changes within the Federal Register. Determining the new pricing levels and awaiting publication could sometimes take several weeks. In times of highly volatile precious metals prices, the re-pricing process could become even more prolonged. For example, in late 2008 the collectible versions of the Platinum Eagle were unavailable for more than two months. Presumably, by the time the US Mint had determined new pricing levels and them prepared for publication, the change in the market price of platinum had already made these numbers outdated.

The old pricing policy with a requirement for publication in the Federal Register is still in effect for products not specifically covered by the new policy. For example, the old policy still covers all numismatic silver products.

The new policy was originally adopted for the 2009 Ultra High Relief Double Eagle, numismatic versions of the American Gold Eagle, American Platinum Eagle, American Gold Buffalo, and First Spouse Gold Coins. In mid 2011, the new policy was also adopted for commemorative gold coins.

How the Flexible Pricing Policy Works

The United States Mint created itemized pricing grids for both gold and platinum numismatic products (here and here for commemoratives). The grids include ranges for the average price of gold established at $50 intervals and ranges for the average price of platinum established at $100 intervals. For each range, price levels are indicated for numismatic products.

Each week, the US Mint determines an average weekly price for gold and platinum. These are calculated based on the London Fix prices (found here) from the prior Thursday AM Fix to the current Wednesday AM Fix. This is inclusive of the PM Fix prices within the period.

For the most recent week, the prices for gold coins were as follows (Monday was a bank holiday in the UK):

May 3 Thurs AM    1,642.50
May 3 Thurs PM    1,637.75
May 4 Fri AM    1,629.50
May 4 Fri PM    1,643.75
May 7 Mon AM  Holiday
May 7 Mon PM  Holiday
May 8 Tue AM    1,627.00
May 8 Tue PM    1,602.50
May 9 Wed AM    1,585.50

These prices yield an average price $1,624.07. Within the US Mint’s pricing grids, this falls into the range of $1,600 to $1,649.99. In the previous week, the average also fell into the same range. As such, there was no change.

If the range falls into a higher or lower range than the previous week, then a pricing change might take place, subject to a second criteria.

To take into account the directional trend of prices, the US Mint looks at the Wednesday PM Fix price. In order for a pricing change to take place, the Wednesday PM fix price must agree directionally with the change. This means that if prices are to be increased, the Wednesday PM price must fall into the same tier or higher as the currently weekly average price. Conversely, if prices are to be decreased, the Wednesday PM price must fall into the same tier or lower as the current weekly average price.

So for a price change to take place, the average weekly price must be in a different range than the prior week and the Wednesday PM price must agree directionally with the change.

A final thing to mention is that the policy reserves the right of the US Mint to discontinue sales of gold numismatic products if the selling price of bullion products begins to approach the sales price of numismatic products. The US Mint has exercised this right on a few occasions in the past when the market price of gold has risen rapidly. It is worth noting that there is not a corresponding right to suspend sales in the event of rapidly falling gold prices.

Some issues with the Flexible Pricing Policy

The catalysts for new policy were “transparency, agility, and customer service”. When the policy was initially released, the US Mint did not reveal the second criteria of the policy, which was initially considered a secondary internal policy. Only through specific inquiry was the internal policy revealed and explained. The US Mint has since included an explanation of both the first and second criteria on the pricing grid pages.

Even with the explanation, the policy is still somewhat complicated and difficult to explain, especially judging by the number of questions that I receive about it.

The US Mint created the policy to be “more responsive to changes in the market price of gold and platinum” (see their press release), however the second criteria of the policy is used “with the intention of minimizing changes to prices” (see this article). These two goals seem to be at odds with one another.

The pricing tiers for platinum coins are established at $100 intervals, while the pricing tiers for gold coins are established at $50 intervals. The US Mint has never provided any specific explanation for this. When the new policy was adopted, the market price of gold was $827 and the market price of platinum was $964. As time moved on, the gap between the metals closed and currently the market price of gold is higher than platinum.

The pricing grid is set up so that for each $50 increase in the average gold price, product prices move up by exactly $50 per ounce, or the proportion thereof. This results in a situation where the percentage premium on the products decreases as the market price of gold increases. At the most extreme example, at a gold market price of $500 per ounce, the Proof Gold Buffalo would be priced at $810, or a premium of 62% over metal. At a gold market price of $2,999.99 per ounce, the Proof Gold Buffalo would be priced at $3,260, or a premium of 8.67% over metal.

The US Mint supposedly manages its numismatic program to a net margin of 10%, so at the extremes the pricing grid wouldn’t work in this regard. The grid also makes the inherent assumptions that the US Mint’s costs are completely fixed regardless of the price of materials and the level of production, which almost certainly cannot be the case.

For its flaws, the US Mint’s flexible pricing policy is better than its old policy. It’s also worth noting that most world mints that sell precious metals numismatic products do not seem to have specific policies with regards to pricing changes. On only one occasion have I seen a world mint reduce numismatic product prices in response to a decline in precious metals.

Friday, May 4, 2012

The End of “Unprecedented Demand”?

After years of struggle, the United States Mint seems to have finally completely caught up and adjusted to the heightened levels of demand for gold and silver coins. Unfortunately, this seems to occurred at just the time when demand has started to decline.

The financial crisis in 2008 brought renewed interest in precious metals as a safe haven asset and alternative investment. Gold and silver bullion coins began to experience “unprecedented demand” and the United States Mint was caught unprepared. During 2008, there were suspensions in the sale of gold, silver, and platinum bullion coins at various times, with sales only resumed on a rationed basis.

Under applicable law at the time, the Mint was required to mint and issue gold and silver bullion coins in quantities necessary to meet public demand. Since they were not able to meet full demand, they were forced to source all incoming precious metals blanks to the production of more bullion coins. This led to the suspension of production and early sell out of the 2008 Proof Silver Eagles, and later the cancellation of the 2009 Proof Gold and Silver Eagles. Meanwhile, production of platinum bullion coins was suspended to free up more manufacturing capacity and has not been resumed to the current date.

Throughout 2009 and 2010, bullion coins were frequently subject to rationing, and the precious metals numismatic offerings that were not canceled were often released late in the year and were quickly snapped up by collectors. For example, after almost a year of uncertainty about its status, the 2010 Proof Silver Eagle was released on November 19 and sold more than 700,000 coins in less than two weeks.

In 2011, the situation improved with rationing lifted for gold bullion coins and only periodically imposed for silver bullion coins. The release dates for precious metals products took place earlier in the year and the Mint was able to resume some previously canceled offerings like the 2011-W Uncirculated Gold and Silver Eagles. The Mint also began striking Silver Eagle bullion coins at the San Francisco Mint to increase capacity. For the fourth year running, annual sales for Silver Eagles set a new record.

This year, the US Mint was able to release the 2012-dated Gold and Silver Eagles on January 3, with no rationing imposed on authorized purchasers. Although sales were strong in January, through the first four months of the year, Silver Eagle bullion coin sales are down 23.53% from the prior year and Gold Eagle bullion coin sales are down 43.22%. On the numismatic front, the 2012 Proof Gold and Silver Eagles were launched early in the year and offered without household ordering limits. The Mint is even planning to offer a special San Francisco Silver Eagle Set with an unlimited mintage during a specified ordering period, among other expected precious metals numismatic offerings.

Does this close the chapter on Silver Eagle shortages and “unprecedented demand”? Or is this just a brief lull in a longer ongoing saga?

I have put together some comparative data for monthly sales of the United States Mint’s bullion coins for 2011 and 2012. In all cases where coins have been available in both years, the monthly sales are lower for 2012 when compared to 2011.

American Silver Eagle Bullion Sales

2011 2012
January     6,422,000     6,107,000
February     3,240,000     1,490,000
March     2,767,000     2,542,000
April     2,819,000     1,520,000
May     3,653,500
June     3,402,000
July     2,968,000
August     3,679,500
September     4,460,500
October     3,064,000
November     1,384,000
December     2,009,000

American Gold Eagle Bullion Sales (ounces)

2011 2012
January 133,500 127,000
February 92,500 21,000
March 73,500 62,500
April 108,000 20,000
May 107,000
June 61,500
July 64,500
August 112,000
September 91,000
October 50,000
November 41,000
December 65,500

American Gold Buffalo Bullion Sales

January 0 13,500
February 0 7,000
March 38,000 26,000
April 20,500 9,000
May 15,500
June 5,500
July 12,000
August 28,000
September 13,000
October 12,500
November 8,500
December 21,000

America the Beautiful Five Ounce Silver Bullion Sales

2011 2012
January 0 5,700
February 0 300
March 0 1,800
April 225,400 200
May 101,400
June 19,000
July 23,700
August 4,100
September 2,900
October 6,200
November 3,300
December 4,400

Friday, April 20, 2012

The Future of Money: Coinage Production

Earlier this week, the House Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy and Technology held a hearing entitled “The Future of Money: Coinage Production”. The subject of the hearing was circulating U.S. coins and what should be done in light of the rising costs of production.

This situation has been receiving an increasing amount of attention following Canada’s decision to eliminate the cent.

As it stands, two bills have been introduced in the House of Representatives calling for cents and nickels to be produced from steel, although neither bill been voted on yet. The United States Mint is in the process of undertaking extensive research and development activities for alternative metallic coinage compositions with a report due to Congress near the end of this year. Any changes to composition would still need to be accomplished through legislation passed by Congress. Meanwhile, the Treasury Department and the United States Mint have continued to ask for direct authority to determine coinage compositions, as proposed in the President’s 2013 Budget.

As a final factor, the seigniorage earned by the United States Mint for circulating coinage production is likely to plunge this year. Production has been drastically reduced for the higher denomination coins which are the most profitable to produce, while production has risen for the lower denominations which are produced at a loss.

As the Subcomittee Chairman, Congressman Ron Paul provided the opening statements for the hearing. The panel of witnesses included John Blake, Executive Vice President of Engineering for Cummins Allison Corporation; Rodney J. Bosco, Director, Disputes and Investigations, Navigant Consulting, Inc.; and Dennis Weber, coin industry analyst. Richard A. Peterson, Deputy Director of the United States Mint was able to provide a written statement for the record.

I summarized some of the main points of the testimony delivered by each witness in this Coin Update article.

Full written testimony and an archived webcast of the hearing can be found here.